Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: Recommendations from anatomical journal editors

Research within the anatomical sciences often relies on human cadaveric tissues. Without the good will of these donors who allow us to use their bodies to push forward our anatomical knowledge, most human anatomical research would come to a standstill. However, many research papers omit an acknowledgement to the donor cadavers or, as no current standardized versions exist, use language that is extremely varied. To remedy this problem, 20 editors‐in‐chiefs from 17 anatomical journals joined together to put together official recommendations that can be used by authors when acknowledging the donor cadavers used in their studies. The goal of these recommendations is to standardize the writing approach by which donors are acknowledged in anatomical studies that use human cadaveric tissues. Such sections in anatomical papers will not only rightfully thank those who made the donation but might also encourage, motivate, and inspire future individuals to make such gifts for the betterment of the anatomical sciences and patient care.     

Second-degree Heart Block Caused by Itolizumab-induced Infusion Reaction in COVID-19

How to cite this article: Kumar A, Kumar N, Lenin D, Kumar A, Ahmad S. Second-degree Heart Block Caused by Itolizumab-induced Infusion Reaction in COVID-19. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(4):474–475.

Sir,Itolizumab, an anti-CD6 humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to domain-1 of CD-6 that is responsible for priming, activation, and differentiation of T-cells.^[1] It significantly reduces T-cell proliferation along with substantial downregulation of the production of cytokines/chemokines.¹ It was approved for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis in 2013. However, it has recently been approved by the Drug Controller General of India for emergency use in India for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome patients due to COVID-19.² Here, we report a case of life-threatening infusion-related hypersensitivity reaction of itolizumab.A 65-year-old male COVID-19 patient got admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with complaints of shortness of breath and cough without any history of known disease. However, the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) done in the ICU was suggestive of left bundle branch block (LBBB) (Fig. 1A). The patient was supported through noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and was started on remdesivir, dexamethasone, low-molecular-weight heparin, antibiotics, and other supportive treatment as per our institutional standard protocol. The patient was maintaining on continuous positive airway pressure mode of NIV with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) of 0.5 on the third day of ICU admission. Among the laboratory markers, the total leucocyte counts were raised (12,000/μL) with decreased lymphocytes (3.2%) and increased inflammatory markers (CRP, 320 mg/L; D dimer >20 μg/mL; LDH, 1694 U/L; IL6, 329 pg/mL). Serum electrolytes, renal function tests, liver function tests, and arterial blood gases were within acceptable limits. The patient was hemodynamically stable with a respiratory rate of 30 to 35/minute and a PO₂/FiO₂ ratio of 140. After taking informed written consent, inj. itolizumab was planned in this patient because of the increasing severity of the disease along with increased inflammatory markers. Inj. hydrocortisone 100 mg IV and inj. pheniramine 30 mg IV were given 30 minutes before itolizumab infusion. And 100 mg of itolizumab (Alzumab-L, Biocon Biologics) was diluted to 250 mL with normal saline and was started at 25 mL/hour. After about 20 minutes of infusion, the patient started complaining of shivering, sweating, and impending doom. The patient had sudden bronchospasm, and oxygen saturation dropped to 90%. ECG showed second-degree AV nodal block with an increased blood pressure of 180/110 mm Hg (Fig. 1B). The drug was immediately withdrawn and the patient was given a repeat dose of hydrocortisone and pheniramine along with other supportive measures. After sometime patients became alert and their respiratory symptoms were relieved. However, the second-degree heart block in ECG was persistent. ECHO was normal and troponin I was within normal limits while there was a slight increase in CPK-MB. The patient was observed closely and the ECG reverted to its previous state only after 24 hours. The patient was weaned from the ventilator in due course of time and put on face mask on the eighth day of stay.Open in a separate windowFigs 1A and B(A) Baseline ECG showing LBBB; (B) ECG showing second-degree AV nodal block after infusion reactionMost infusion reactions related to monoclonal antibodies are IgE mediated and are mild (grade 1 or 2) in nature.³ The incidence of severe (grade 3 or 4) reactions is generally low. The reported infusion-related reactions to itolizumab are chills/rigors (common), nausea, flushing, urticaria, cough, hypersensitivity, pruritus, rash, wheezing, dyspnea, oxygen desaturation, dizziness, headache, and hypertension. In our case, itolizumab infusion leads to a grade 4 reaction causing a persistent second-degree heart block for about 24 hours. Among the monoclonal antibodies, rituximab is most notorious for causing infusion reactions.⁴ There are only a few reports of cardiac arrhythmias (monomorphic VT, supraventricular tachycardia, trigeminy, and irregular pulse) during therapeutic infusion of rituximab,⁵ and there is no reported case of cardiac arrhythmia during itolizumab infusion. In our case, the patient was having LBBB and was on a QT prolonging drug (remdesivir), which might be a predisposing factor for the occurrence of second-degree heart block during infusion reaction. Premedications (e.g., antipyretics, antihistamines, and steroids) are recommended before the administration of some chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies. These drugs should never be given as IV bolus and should always be given slowly in an infusion. Baseline assessments including vital signs and cognition should be documented carefully before the start of treatment and all the emergency equipment and drugs should be kept ready. Grade 3 and 4 reactions should be managed promptly with epinephrine, antihistaminics, and steroids along with other symptomatic supportive measures. As itolizumab is approved for emergency use in COVID-19, risk-benefit ratio should be assessed before prescribing this and should be explained before taking consent for infusion.The patient provided written informed consent for the publication.     

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Evaluating Point-of-Care Tests of Coagulopathy in Cardiac Surgery

Treatment guidelines recommend the routine use of point-of-care diagnostic tests for coagulopathy in the management of cardiac surgery patients at risk of severe bleeding despite uncertainty as to their diagnostic accuracy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of viscoelastometry, platelet function tests, and modified thromboelastography (TEG) tests, for coagulopathy in cardiac surgery patients. The reference standard included resternotomy for bleeding, transfusion of non-red cell components, or massive transfusion. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials.gov, from inception to June 2019. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Bivariate models were used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with (95% confidence intervals). All 29 studies (7440 participants) included in the data synthesis evaluated the tests as predictors of bleeding. No study evaluated their role in the management of bleeding. None was at low risk of bias. Four were judged as low concern regarding applicability. Pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy were; Viscoelastic tests, 12 studies, sensitivity 0.61 (0.44, 0.76), specificity 0.83 (0.70, 0.91) with significant heterogeneity. Platelet function tests, 12 studies, sensitivity 0.63 (0.53, 0.72), specificity 0.75 (0.64, 0.84) with significant heterogeneity. TEG modification tests, 3 studies, sensitivity 0.80 (0.67, 0.89), specificity 0.76 (0.69, 0.82) with no evidence of heterogeneity. Studies reporting the highest values for sensitivity and specificity had important methodological limitations. In conclusion, we did not demonstrate predictive accuracy for commonly used point-of-care devices for coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery. However, the certainty of the evidence was low.     

Impact of dietary polyphenols on neuroinflammation-associated disorders

Neurological Sciences - Neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and associated dementia typically originate with altered protein folding and aggregation of their...     

A National Analysis of Minimally Invasive Vs Open Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

1. Download : Download high-res image (280KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image